Ambiguous act equilibria
نویسنده
چکیده
A novel approach for the study of games with strategic uncertainty is proposed. Games are defined such that players’ strategy spaces do nor only contain pure and mixed strategies but also contain “ambiguous act strategies”, in the sense that players can base their choices on subjective randomization devices. The notions of “independent strategies” as well as “common priors” are relaxed in such a manner that they can be applied to the context of games with strategic uncertainty even though the player’s preferences cannot necessarily be represented by expected utility functions. The concept of “Ambiguous Act Equilibrium” is defined. The main result concerns two player games in which preferences of all players satisfy Schmeidler’s uncertainty aversion as well as transitivity and monotonicity. The ambiguous act equilibria of such a game are observationally equivalent to the mixed strategy equilibria of that game in the sense that a researcher who can only observe equilibrium outcomes is not able to determine whether the players are uncertainty averse or uncertainty neutral.
منابع مشابه
Knightian games and robustness to ambiguity
This paper considers incomplete information games with ambiguous beliefs represented by compact sets of probability measures. We propose a definition of equilibrium for such games that does not rely on a max-min decision rule, but instead requires equilibrium strategies to be approximate best responses for all measures that define a player’s belief. We apply the resulting model of a game with a...
متن کاملA limit theorem for equilibria under ambiguous belief correspondences
Previous literature shows that, in many different models, limits of equilibria of perturbed games are equilibria of the unperturbed game when the sequence of perturbed games converges to the unperturbed one in an appropriate sense. The question whether such limit property extends to the equilibrium notions in ambiguous games is not yet clear as it seems; in fact, previous literature shows that ...
متن کاملEndogenous ambiguity in cheap talk
We provide a rationale for ambiguous communication. We do so by considering a cheap talk game in which a (possibly ambiguity averse) sender (S) able to randomize according to unknown probabilities faces an ambiguity averse receiver (R). We show that under fairly general circumstances, there exist equilibria featuring Ellsbergian communication strategies that allow both S and R to obtain a highe...
متن کاملEfficiency and equilibrium when preferences are time-inconsistent
We consider an exchange economy with time-inconsistent consumers whose preferences are additively separable. When these consumers trade in a sequence of markets, their time-inconsistency may introduce a non-convexity that gives them an incentive to trade lotteries. If there are many consumers, competitive equilibria with and without lotteries exist. The existence of symmetric equilibria may req...
متن کاملVariational preferences and equilibria in games under ambiguous belief correspondences
In previous papers we studied a game model in which players' uncertainty is expressed entirely in the space of probabilities (lotteries) over consequences, it depends on the entire strategy profile chosen by the agents and it is described by the so called ambiguous beliefs correspondences. In this paper, we extend the previous results by embodying variational preferences in the model. We give a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 71 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011